Showing posts with label Gospel of John. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gospel of John. Show all posts

"No More" Sermon for Easter 5C


A sermon for the 5th Sunday of Easter, preached at St. John Lutheran Church of Prairie Hill on April 21, 2013. Texts: Revelation 21:1-6 and John 13:31-35.

(Thank you to Pastor Clint Schnekloth for his insight about the promise "No More" as a central element of this text. Subscribe to Pastor Schnekloth's sermons on iTunes and read his other ideas on his blog.)

Note: In the past, I have recorded a "podcast version" of the sermon on Monday. This week, I uploaded the recording from one of the Sunday services, with a little introduction. What do you think? Does it make a difference to you?





Subscribe to Sermon Podcast via Itunes

Subscribe to Sermons in an RSS reader


Saving the Best for Last!

"Saving the Best for Last!" a sermon for the second Sunday after Epiphany, 2013. Preached at St. John Lutheran Church of Prairie Hill on January 20, 2013. 


Gospel Lesson: The Wedding at Cana, John 2:1-11

(The story about the Italian in North Georgia comes from a reflection by Pastor Delmer Chilton)



Subscribe to Sermon Podcast via Itunes

Subscribe to Sermons in an RSS reader

A Wedding Sermon

Wedding sermons are unique - they are sort of like a conversation between the pastor and the couple, but a conversation when you know that everyone else is listening in and you are also speaking to them. This was the conversation I had with William and Jennifer on the occasion of their wedding at St. John - Prairie Hill. Texts for the day were Genesis 2:18-24, Colossians 3:12-17, and John 15:9-12.

Grace and peace to you in the name of the Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.


It really is a joy to be here today, gathered with you, William and Jennifer, and surrounded here by all of your family and friends. It is one of the privileges of my job that I am invited to be a part of celebrations like this – and I thank you for inviting me to be a part of this special day.

After the service today, when everyone is gone, I will go back to my office, and I will sign this piece of paper (Hold up Marriage License). Apparently there was some question about whether you would remember to get this on time. I don’t know, that’s just what I was told.

But this is your marriage license. It was given to you by the state of Texas, and I will send it back to the state of Texas. Everyone who has been married in Texas has one of these.
Some folks have it in a nice frame, up on the wall somewhere in their house.
Some might have it in a lock box with other important documents to keep it safe.
Maybe some are like the lawyer who had his marriage license out and was reading it one night, when his wife asked him what he was doing. He said, “Looking for a loophole.”


Regardless of what you do with this piece of paper, I want to tell you a secret; you know, just between the three of us …

It’s just a piece of paper. Really. That’s all.
This piece of paper is not a marriage.
In fact, everything we are doing today is not a marriage. Don’t get me wrong, this is a great day. It is wonderful to be in this place, with all these people, witnessing your vows to one another. This place where grandparents said their vows, and where parents said their vows – it is good to be here.

But as good as it is to be here, don’t get confused: this is a wedding, not a marriage.
What makes a marriage is what comes next.
What makes a marriage is what you do tomorrow, and the next day, and the following weeks and months and years.

For many weddings, the couple will look at my list of recommended readings and say, “Pastor, you just choose something.” Or they’ll use First Corinthians chapter 13, because it is what is used at everyone else’s wedding, right? And that’s fine for those people. But not for William & Jennifer.

We talked quite a bit about what readings would be most appropriate today. What would express the life that they want to live together. And I am glad we settled on what we did today, Especially that Gospel lesson from Saint John.

Especially that one little bit – the bit that often gets cut out of wedding services: “No one has greater love than this, to lay down one's life for one's friends.” As we talked about it, the question was asked, “Surely that’s not appropriate for a wedding?”
And the answer is: few things could be more appropriate.

Because here is the truth: Chances are that you will never be asked to give up your life for your spouse. But, you will have to give up yourself for your spouse.
Marriage is not a piece of paper, it is a gift.

Jennifer, today you will give yourself to William.
And William, today you will give yourself to Jennifer.

Those are the words that we used as we began this service: William, will you give yourself to Jennifer, to share your life with her? And Jennifer, will you give yourself to William, to share your life with him?

Marriage is a gift, the gift of yourself, of your life. And it is not just today.

Every day from here forward, you must continue to give yourselves to one another. That is a marriage.

It means letting go of petty fights about who is right and who is wrong.
It means putting your spouse’s interests – their wants and desires and happiness – ahead of your own.
It means, William, that Jennifer’s happiness is more important than yours.
And it means, before you smile about that to much, Jennifer, that William’s happiness is more important than yours. That is a marriage.

That is precisely what Jesus means when he gives his disciples their one and only commandment, to love one another. That is what Paul means, when he tells us to be clothed in love. That is what means to become one flesh, forever joined together.

You are each your wedding gift to one another. And your marriage is the gift of continuing to give yourselves to one another.
A warning. It must be both of you, and it must be a decision you continue to make every day.
And with that gift to each other, with that shared love, I know that you will have a marriage that will last through the ages, and stand as a witness to all of the love of God. God bless you.

But that’s enough of me talking; let’s get to the main event. William and Jennifer, I invite you to come and begin the adventure of your marriage by declaring your vows to one another here in the presence of God and of God’s people.

Punctuation & Theology

This morning's Gospel lesson comes from John 9 - the story of the man born blind. It posed an important question for Jesus' disciples: Who was to blame? In the ancient world (and in the minds of many still today!), if something goes wrong in your life, you must have done something to deserve it. If you are sick, if your fortunes dry up, if you are affect by a tragedy or an accident, it must be because of some sin in your life. (It is worth noting that this is also the perspective of Job's "friends," who try to find out what sin it is that he hasn't confessed that is causing the tragedy in his life).

This man, however, was born blind. How could he have sinned before his birth, and caused his blindness? And so, they ask, "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?"

And Jesus answered: “Neither this man nor his parents sinned; he was born blind so that God’s works might be revealed in him. We must work the works of him who sent me while it is day; night is coming when no one can work." (NRSV)

Jesus takes the blame off of the parents and the man himself. But, it appears that there is still blame. At least as rendered by the NRSV, the man is blind for God's purposes - if there is blame to assign, it appears that God is (at least implicitly) to blame.

But what happens if you move around the punctuation a little? If you re-think the editor's/translator's decisions about how to parse the sentence structure? You might wind up with something like this:

And Jesus answered: “Neither this man nor his parents sinned; he was born blind. But that God’s works might be revealed in him, we must work the works of him who sent me while it is day; night is coming when no one can work."
A portion of uncial manuscript Codec
Sinaiticus without punctuation.
public domain image

A little change in punctuation, and you wind up with a much different theology. It's not that God made this man blind to show his glory. It's that this man was born blind. Period. End of sentence. Just a fact of life. This world is broken, and tragedy happens. The question is not about why he is blind or who is to blame. The fact is, he is blind. The question is what are we going to do now? "That God's work might be revealed, we must work the works of him who sent me." He's blind, what are we going to do about it?

How often in our lives do we occupy our time playing the blame game? Trying to figure out what went wrong, how it went wrong, and who's to blame?

What Jesus wants to know is, what are we going to in the face of the brokenness and tragedy of this world?